Henry ... a happy 2010 to you and your family of readers. It is a great pity that I have to open the new year with yet another blast concerning these pest muslims and their useless Islam. Today's Guardian newspaper details a cowardly mistake by both the US and Britain ... both nations are running away in Yemen when the enemy indicates he is about to attack.  

When I was in an army many years ago we were encouraged to think that when the enemy approached you got ready for battle, not flight. I can understand how women and children should be sent to safety and the Embassies closed for business. However, the flag cannot be lowered and the buildings cannot be abandoned. Instead, both the US and Britain should have sent several hundred Marine re-inforcements to their Embassies and prepared to slug it out with al-Qaida. Now with this runaway policy, the local arabs will get the idea that the West is on the run from their 'heroes of Islam'. This is a reasonable thing to think when we see the Americans and the British actually run away.
 
This cowardice has some background. Britain is now a complete dead loss. Government by multi-culti appeasers over the past decade or more has emasculated the 'Great' from Britain in a way that now cannot be reversed in any real sense. Gordon Brown is a suitable leader for such a reduced and shamefaced nation. The British people have been betrayed by men and women who are not fit to dust the shoes of men like Churchill or the Labour leaders in 1940s Britain. It is actually heartbreaking for a man like me to see the reduction of Britain to this pathetic condition. Presumably the British are now preparing their exit from History.
 
The American cowardice is, I think, more directly linked to President Obama personally.  His world view fits in neatly with a policy of endless excuse mongering for Islam and a refusal to 'call the baby by its name'. The baby's name is 'Armed Islamic Supremacism' ... AIS for short. It is impossible to get any American official to deal with AIS and talk logically and coherently about the problems AIS bring to our lives. This policy of running away fits in well with the ignoring of AIS.
 
Ironically the continuation of wars is not a sign of American intelligence in relation to AIS. Afghanistan has a lot more to do with the drug trade and oil/gas pipelines than democracy and freedom of women in Afghanistan. As well, the problems we really face with AIS are problems found at home, not the problems hovering around the Khyber Pass.
 
It is becoming more and more obvious that we in the West are going to have to summon up the courage to deal drastically with the AIS and the broad mass of muslims amongst whom the armed activistas hide. Some 'out of the box' thinking will need to be done. We cannot continue having our lives disrupted non-stop by the fantasies and violence of AIS coalitions and plotters. Action needs to be taken ... serious action. Action which actually puts strong and serious pressure on the broad mass of muslims who have any connection with our societies. This pressure must be brought to bear to goad them to turn on the crazies in their midst. Henry, we don't have to take this any more. Here are five 'out of the box' suggestions for consideration.
 
1.All airlines flying into and out from Western destinations should now ban muslims from flying in Western jurisdictions. Their 'prophet' never flew ... he travelled by land. They can emulate him. This doesn't prevent them from travel, it simply makes it very onerous for them and dissipates the political value of all the plastic explosive studies they are engaged in.
 
2.If this is a difficult action, try banning all luggage for muslim passengers ... hand luggage and passenger luggage. Very inconvenient but that is all. Some efforts have to be made (unless you are a British official) to stymie and disrupt their plans. We can't just sit down as permanent targets ... each of us waiting for his turn in the gunsights.
 
3. Stop taking muslim students into Western education venues. Such an educational crisis will provoke the muslim middle classes in the backward muslim countries to some sort of action. These are the only people who can exercise what tiny pressure can be actually put on the tyrants who run every muslim nation.
 
4. Deport all the imams and other manpower who staff the AIS front groups in the West. These groups are well known to all Western security services. More disruption of their arrangements will be a benefit to us and a cost to them.
 
5. The Western economic powers have to construct a 'Counter-Opec'. The oil price should be fixed by the West at $10 a barrel for a five year period. This will cut the revenue of our sworn enemies very drastically and also be an economic fillup to the West. The economic crisis this will bring to the muslim world is of no concern to us. Let them introduce general taxation and proper fiscal regimes into the budgets of their cess pit countries. What do we care!? Their military capacity to oppose such a serious move by the West is zilch .. zero.. nada..
 
Henry, policy moves such as these would have a massively disruptive effect on the broad muslim masses who are now connected with the West. These moves could be the basis for halting the movement of these disruptive and culturally alien people into our lives. We don't need them and they bring nothing to our lives that we want. This disruption would badly effect the AIS element in Islam and among the muslims. This disruption is a good thing and if it was done with verve and imagination it could take the place of violence and warfare on our part toward them.
 
In short, we must adopt the policing policy of J.Edgar Hoover.
 
The great policeman was once asked what was his 'philosophy of policing'. He answered that it had two elements ... part 1: 'get the bums on the run' ... part 2: 'keep them on the run'.
 
Henry, the day is approaching when we will also have to get these islamic bums on the run. I recommend that Australia's public figures address this matter as a priority.
 
Is this an opening for Tony Abbott?