Industrial relations key to Australian prosperity
Date: Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Author: Henry Thornton
Business conditions recovering, with sentiment again 'above trend', reports the National Australia bank.
In summary: 'THE economy is staging a powerful recovery from a summer of disasters and the annual growth rate could reach 4 per cent by the middle of the year.'
The bank reported: • The Australian economy appears to be showing signs of recovery following the flood-induced slowdown, with the NAB business survey reporting a marked improvement in business conditions in March, driven by sharp rises in trading conditions and profitability. The overall business conditions index is now at its highest level since March 2010. Conditions in Queensland improved significantly in the month but are still very poor. Business confidence declined in March, though remains positive and above trend. More broadly, confidence is now more in line with business conditions (or outcomes). • Forwards orders and stocks picked up, and are now in positive territory. Capacity utilisation also edged a little higher. The survey is consistent with annualised domestic demand growth of around 2½% in the March quarter which, given the impact of recent floods on coal and commodity exports, suggests a flat to negative outcome for GDP in Q1. That would imply a 6-monthly annualised rate of around 1½% versus the survey read of 2¾%. Maintaining March monthly readings in Q2 it would imply a return to more than 4% growth. • Labour costs were broadly unchanged but continue to trend down in annualised 3-month-average terms. While price inflation remained relatively low, purchase costs are rising.
The Australian's David Uren spoke to NAB's Chief Economist, Alan Oster, who added the helpful colour that 'all industries registered a huge improvement in March' and that the improvement continued in April.
Oster added: "We're getting the first inkling that we're looking at strong growth in the June quarter," he said. "That is consistent with what the Reserve Bank is thinking."
It is also, incidentally, what Henry has been thinking, with growth again at the 4 % rate that indicates the onset of inflatioary pressures.
The NAB reports that inflation remains low, but purchase costs are rising. Whether the Reserve Bank was right or wrong to hold its fire on rate hikes so far this year will depend largely on whether wages surge.
Under the howard government's WorkChoices legislation there would have been a fair chance of this. After the Rudd-Gillard rollback there is a more than even chance that wages will break out.
Talk of a 'tough budget', immediately contradicted by promises to 'overcompensate' battlers for the carbon tax, will not hold the line.
And there is still no policy for productivity, which has been languishing since the effect of the last big economic reforms of the Howard government wore off, with the slowing also impacted by IR rollabck.
It is no exaggeration to say that Australia's immediate prosperity is in the hands of union bosses. Go for the doctor, comrades, and interest rates will be higher, the budget will be tougher (with a mini-budget after the faux-tough budget we are about to get) and the miracle economy will do more than stumble as it did in Q1, 2011. It will have fallen flat on its face.
Lest we forget
Date: Friday, April 25, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
Courtesy The Australian
Monetary policy - mixed up confusion
Date: Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Author: PD Jonson
Earlier this week we were told that Treasurer Joe Hockey was 'unhappy with' the RBA. Knowledgable RBA watcher, Terry McCrann, scotched this suggestion in a thoughtful article that also explained the Treasury Secretary's twice delayed marching orders. In both cases, McCrann concludes, 'just as Hockey has bonded well with Parkinson, he’s done the same with Stevens. Hockey’s personality is one of winning friends and influencing people; not barking pointlessly at key allies'.
But something odd is going on. Today the AFR's Economics Editor, Alan Mitchell says 'The IMF's tacit seal of approval for central bank intervention in asset booms can be seen as a concession to the RBA's approach'.
The RBA's approach, Mitchell claims, is one of 'leaning into' asset booms by raising interest rates. He claims this is what the RBA did succesfully at the start of the current decade - even though the politics of leaning against asset price bubbles is 'appalling' and its success - avoiding an asset crash by heading off an asset bubble - is impossible to prove.
Alert readers will recall John Howard as Prime minister say something like: 'Nobody comes up to me in the street to complain about increases in the price of their house'. Nor do many voters tell the PM or Treasurer, 'please get that nice Mr Stevens to raise interest rates to stop me getting rich'.
However, a policy of 'leaning into' asset boom by raising interest rates is not the answer to the logical contradictions now bedevilling Australian and global monetary policy.
In the countries which have have severe recession, interest rates have been set at record low levels, virtually zero, while share prices go through the roof. Should the US Fed have 'leaned into' the share boom with, say, cash interest rates at 2 %, while the real economy was struggling to avoid severe recession becoming depression? No way, Jose, is the sensible answer.
In Australia, while the Aussie dollar was widely perceived as too high, while the economy was struggling, cuts to cash interest rates were widely seen as a useful way to stimulate the economy while also reducing the currency, helped along by RBA's jawboning the forex market. This policy failed, as demonstrated by the subsequent revival of the Aussie dollar as the economy improved somewhat. Now another set of asset prices, house prices, are widely perceived to be booming again. Should the RBA 'lean into' house prices, even if this damages the real economy and pushes the Aussie dollar even higher? Jose says 'don't be silly, comrade'.
The answer, of course, is that seperate targets require seperate policies. I have proposed a variable tax on capital inflows to tame the dollar, and (automatic) variable asset ratios for banks and other financiers to take the sting out of housing booms and to encourage new spending in busts. This approach would leave cash interest rates to focus totally on the state of the economy, and not provide the ugly dilemmas that have been the focus of much useless discussion.
Of course, Mr Stevens, if perfectly unzipped, might say there are other ways to influence asset prices. House prices might be lower if governments simplified planning laws and made land more quickly available to build houses. The Aussie dollar would be lower if the budget deficit were lower, and reduced spending or higher taxes in a tough budget might also have a useful impact on house prices. Both points are fair enough, but we are where we are. Glenn Stevens must indeed be hanging out for a tough budget, in the reasonable expectation that it would take pressure off both the currency and the housing market.
But unless and until policies other than cash interest rates are brought to bear, there will be a natural (but painful) end to asset booms. My fear is that the US Fed will not be able to prevent a big fall in global share prices as it seeks, ever so slowly, to normalise US monetary policy. I also fear that when the Aussie dollar finally corrects its current overvalued levels, it will undershoot , producing another destructive lurch in the structure of the Australian economy. Ditto for the eventual but inevitable correction of house prices.
Milton Friedman, a far greater economist than anyone mentioned in this blog, famously said 'monetary policy cannot serve two masters'. I must confess I did not fully understand what he meant at the time. My greatest fear is that no-one now in power in Australia yet understands this point.
Today's news, consumer inflation slightly less than feared, still within the RBA's target zone, does not dispose of the issues canvassed above. It does provide time for the RBA to rethink its 'one instrument, multiple targets' approach. This writer had the searing experience of abandoning support for the 'monetary projection' approach to setting cash interest rates, and it would be no disgrace if the RBA adopted a multiple aims, multiple policies approach to monetary policy and macroprudential policy.
Professor Warwick McKibbin, 2/5
I agree that interest rates should NOT be used to bring down the dollar. The RBA has already probably injected an asset bubble into the economy so that foreigners will want to hold appreciating Australian assets which hurts the original goal of lowering rates to bring down the exchange rate. In my view the nominal interest rate (lets use the corporate bond rate) should be equal to the nominal growth rate for policy to be neutral. Corporate borrowing rates are around 3.75% which when compared to the nominal GDP growth rate of 5.5% shows that monetary policy is very loose in Australia.
I disagree with a capital flow tax because as I have written before this raise the cost of access to external finance and reduces the equilibrium capital stock in Australia because you need to get a higher MPK to cover the additional cost of borrowing. We need foreign capital to help fund our growth. Far better to concentrate on cutting input costs (i.e. raising productivity) through a range of policies like tax reform, removing inefficient government regulation, raising the infrastructure capital stock etc) so that the currencies strength does not lead to unemployed resources. Also a good idea to reduce government borrowing so we need less foreign capital.
The fact that the US and other countries that have had a financial crisis have low policy interest rate does not mean Australia should follow suit because we do not have the balance sheet problem they have – although we might soon generate our own if we keep the current stance of monetary policy!.
PD Jonson replies.
I understand your reason for rejecting a tax on capital inflow, and I agree that reducing input costs by raising productivity would be a better way of coping.
However, as you know, increasing productivity might at best produce 1 to 2 % improvement per annum, and if the overall cost level is 20 to 30 % above any sensible equilibrium, fixing it that way is just not feasible.
I also disagree that capital inflow would dry up. Indeed, with Australia showing the strength not to allow its industrial structure to be determined by foreign investors, capital inflow might even increase for a time. Something like this happened in Germany half a century ago.
Tough budget on the way, Caaaarlton! finally wins a game
Date: Monday, April 21, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
The budget leaks and imspired guesses continue. It will be tough, pension age increased to, say, 70 years, but not until 2030, no means test for pensioners, cutting and scraping at Commonwealth public service, and so on and so forth. But no broader GST, or broader and with a higher rate GST, the one reform virtually all econmomists see as the least bad way to balance the books with least damage, indeed some benefit for, incentives to work, to take risks and to save.
Henry suggests a Commonwealth version of Queensland's slick ads would be worth showing on prime time telly. 'Do you prefer spending cuts, tax increases or sale of assets?'. One gathers that neither 'None of the above' nor 'All of the above' are on the list, but at least this set of options is a nice way to tell people there is no such thing as a free lunch, a fact that oppositions keep suggesting is possible. Click here to vote at the 'Advice to the Queensland premier' website and it seems you can vote multiple times, even if you live in Victoria, Burma or even Sweden.
When perfected, with a logically complete set of options, this approach may revolutionise politics, back to the old Athenian town meetings, conducted electronically.
Des Moore's view
Speculation continues on the federal budget without substantive economic analysis to support the large spending reductions needed to prevent, as Shanahan suggests below, a damp squib.
Let me be clear here: while there is no doubt that Labor left irresponsibly large spending commitments stretching into the future, commitments for next year (2014-15) are “only” 2 percentage points of GDP above what they were in the final year of the Howard government in 2007-08. It should be politically practicable – and not damaging to the economy unless Keynesianism is allowed – to return to 2007-08 GDP rates or close to them in 2014-15. Such action would also come close to eliminating the deficit.
But Shanahan has felt it necessary, so close to the budget date, to raise the possibility of a damp squib and to leave the impression that the Coalition has not settled on the main aggregate outcomes. Given the lengthy period since it assumed office, that is a disheartening perspective.
At least Caaarlton! has won a game. And it was without Judd, two-and-a-half men down in the last part of the game and using Brett Rattan's hard tackling, helter skelter, straight up the guts style ditched by Supercoach Mick Malthouse. One hopes this was the result of the players telling Mick thhat they preferred their old style and were thus empowered for the first time since Mick came along to destroy Caaartlon!'s free flowing, attacking style. Could this be a collingwood plot? Stranger things have happened in the James Bond movies, and we all think truth can be stranger than fiction.
Date: Friday, April 18, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
16" x 36" Oil on old kitchen cupboard door Signed bottom left Jonson 68
Painted on an old kitchen cupboard during a time of adolescent religious fervour, the piece was rejected by the organisers of the local Church Art Show. ("Far too modernist" might have been the comment but apparently the committee objected to the nail holes. "You have problems with the nail holes" was my response, but the stout Presbyterians failed to see my point.) With Crowdy Bay, still my favourite painting.
Sunday Sanity Break, 13 April 2014, updated 16 April
Date: Wednesday, April 16, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
Greetings from Wuhan, a small, well, smallish, town of 20 million souls, situated on the Yangtze River, two hours flight from Hong Kong. We are here to meet some brilliant scientists, and even more brilliant PHD students, all dedicated to remediating the environment. As we are reading Stephen Baxter's Transcendence, whose subplot is the final destruction of the Earth's environment, the subject assumes additional drama.
Henry has been struggling with the Chinese censor and the (alleged) shortcomings of his steam-powered notebook. He has three ways to communicate with home, with Mrs Thornton presiding - Skype, gmail and bigpond.com. Skype was not available in Hong Kong, and is also not available in Wuhan. Google was not available in Hong Kong, and so far at least is not available in Wuhan - 'It is intermittantly available', as one native said. Bigpond.com is available, and informed Henry of the disgraceful Caaarlton! loss to Melbourne - what were they smoking Mick? Whose tenure, and/or that of others, must now be under scrutiny.
Bigpond.com is available, as I said, but when I tried to open Webmail I got the same messages given by Skype and Google - 'No security certificate available' - which is not what one gets in Melbourne, London, Tokyo or New York, or for all I know Burma. What is the reason for blocking these sites, if that is what is going on? Facts plus factoids (Google); communication with the outside world (Skype) or bigpond webmail (ditto).
I must confess that the hotel staff in Wuhan have attended in large groups and are implying it is Henry's steam driven notebook that is the problem. More tomorrow, provided Henry's site is allowed to continue broadcasting. It was unavailable in Hong Kong, and suddenly was available in Wuhan. Who knows what will happen in Shaoguan?
So far we have travelled by aeroplane - 14 hours to Hong Kong, on CX 104, then after a brief sleep in the Regal Airport Hotel, within walking distrance of the airport, 2 hours by Dragonair to Wuhan. Tomorrow it is the bullet train to Shaoguan, another meeting and dinner, another sleep followed by the bullet train to Hong Kong.
Attended a great conference today mainly very bright young Chinese students reporting on their research. Then headed for the bullet train for Shaoguan a city about halfway between Wuhan and Hong Kong. The line goes on to within 45 minutes by road to Hong Kong. 'China would complete the link to Hong Kong in a year or so, but Hong Kong has a democratic government that is weak', explained our Chinese travelling companion.
Security was less than at an airport, but all luggage was scanned and bodies were frisked electronically. Our tickets took us to the rear carriage where first class seats had been booked. The carriage was marked First/business, and we were in a small compartment with five seats almost as luxurious as those in a Gold Class cinema. Our fare was 600 RMB, and when two of us sat in the two larger 'first class' front facing seats we were told firmly that they were double the price of the mere 'normal' first class seats. So in this socialist paradise, there are four classes of bullet train seats - Economy, Business, First and Superfirst.
The train rode near-silently on its cushion of air and quickly and effortlessly glided to its travel speed of 300 kph. (It was 350 kpm until a vast crash at this speed had killed many passengers.) We chatted as the green and hilly countryside glided past - neat fields and two story houses and in the hillier parts forests. Sadly saw no pandas chewing leaves. Our travelling companions told me the general Chinese view of what had happened to Malayian Flight 780. The captain, a known friend of Mr Anwar, so the story goes, had hijacked the plane to barter the life of his passsengers for Mr Anwar's freedom. If the trade was not agreed, the captain said he would fly the plane into a prominant city building. The government said 'no way Jose' and asked the USA to shoot down the plane, which it promptly did.
Other stories abound, all with the theme that the USA, China and Japan knew at all times exactly where the plane was located. One varient had lithium batteries in the hold, one or more of which caught fire and created a small breach in the hull. Gradual aphixiation overcome the crew and passengers and the plane flew on until it ran out of fuel. Mr Abbott's recent very confident assertion that the black box recorder would soon be found played into the conspiracy theories. 'On the facts we know, he should not be so confident', said one of Henry's companions.
Soon the train will rocket into Hunan, birthplace of 'Uncle Mao' as one wag described his statue as we were driven to the train station in Wuhan. Like most other things in China, the railway is built on a vast scale, with wide platforms and many sets of rails. There was notable signs of forward thinking, or poor planning, in vast apparently completed but unused freeways.
We arrived safely at the end of the rail to be picked up and driven to Hong Kong where business will dominate proceedings. We have been warned that exiting 'China' and entering 'Hong Kong' may be a bit tiresome. But then we shall be in the city that has been described as China's main exemplar of a free society, showing the path ot a more dynamic economy and a freer society. Will Henry be able to access his favourite web sites? That will be a (minor) sign of progress, or its lack.
Henry arrived home at about 8 AM today (16 April) after the three-movie flight from Hong Kong. All was well, except for the massive build up of unanswered emails due to lack of internet connectivity in China/Hong Kong. One was able to read the Oz and the Fin in the airport lounge, which suddenly reminds one of the almost total lack of English newsprint or TV coverage in Wuhan and Shaoguan. In Hong Kong there is The South China Post and other options, including on TV.
The great dragon is roaring, gentle readers, but growth seems to be slowing and there are continuing concerns about property markets, the so-called 'shadow' banking system and the need for State Owned Enterprises to focus on making money instead of creating jobs.
Tony Abbot's visit and Australia's work in coordinating the search for the lost plane seems to have reinforced our status as a friend of China, also helped more indirectly by the freer trade agreements with South Korea and Japan announced on the same trip. Some of the business propositions we were presented with, involving remediation of a number of specific environmental problems in what is a seriously polluted environment, would reinforce that positioning.
Freer trade makes us stronger
Date: Thursday, April 10, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
Another day, another country, and another free, correction, freer, trade agreement. What fun the PM and his band of 600 sherpas must be happening, except of course when the big Australian Airforce plane cannot take off. Still, this is about this government's best week, and it has produced substantitive results. Despite caveats - bad luck rice farmers - freer trade makes us stronger and builds links that go way beyond the fun of international conferences and windy communiques.
The PM has arrived in China to be greeted without a frown from his hosts (important that), allowed to review the troops (one assumes a sobering moment) and to begin talks that we hope eventually produces a freer trade agreement with China that includes the rice farmers.
Henry's review of Ian Morris' splendid Why the West Rules - For Now introduces a book that should be required reading for anyone in the China deal-making or even just the Chinese commentary business.
Meanwhile, back home, or where-ever Joe Hockey calls home these days, the battle for the budget goes on. Today's assistance comes from the International Monetary Fund, who earlier this week was helping us get our monetary policy right. 'She'll be right as it is, comrades, said the current leaders of the financial services business in Australia. Let's hope so, or there will be some hangings followed by a bonfire of the vanities.
The IMF points out that, while Australia still has one of the lowect ratios of government debt to GDP, that debt is rising faster than that in almost any other 'developed' nation, and it will require a hurculean job to rein in spending, raise taxes and produce a surplus. The hurculean effort will somply stop the rot. Repeating the effort of Howard and Costello so that the debt is wiped out and the Future Fund can start growing via new injections is just about unthinkable.
A snippet of news today says that business insolvencies are starting to mount. This reminds Henry of the situation in 1990, reported here to an unresponsive Treasury and RBA. Nothing like it was in 1990/91, with cash interest rates at record levels, a deteriorating budget and Australia's costs well above those of competitor nations. Come to think about it, it is only the RBA that is (so far) acting different.
The lead up to the experience known as the 'GFC' has been called in Australia 'The Great Complacency'. Thanks to the China boom, we sailed through the GFC virtually unscathed, a 'miracle economy'. But the signs were all there - low productivity growth, costs rising faster than in competitor nations and still complacent econocrats. Having enjoyed the dance, now the piper must be paid, and we shall all share in the payments.
Luckily, the freer trade deals will make us better able to pay the piper.
Monetary policy - `the narrative` matters
Date: Tuesday, April 08, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
Bugger me dead, as Henry's old footy coach used say. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) is chanelling Henry, via David Uren. Medium Uren reports: 'The International Monetary Fund has urged the return of multiple objectives for central banks, arguing that an exclusive concern with price stability has been shown to be inadequate.
'The fund says monetary policy faces a highly uncertain future, with doubts about its objectives, its policy decision rules and central bank independence.
“Until these issues are better understood, monetary policy will involve more art and less science,” the fund says'.
These stunning insights allegedly come from a 'staff paper prepared for the IMF ministerial meeting this weekend'. This is the news before the news, unless of course you have followed the debate in these pages, and summarised in Henry's submission to the Murray inquiry. We had been steeling ourselves to be ignored, but if the IMF is on the same page, just maybe Mr Murray will ask Kevin Davis to take a look and report back.
But I digress. Mr Uren goes on. 'The fund says the global financial crisis has challenged the notion that achieving price stability is sufficient to deliver macro-economic stability and raises the question of whether other objectives should enter the mandate of monetary policy.
'Yet the IMF says that while there is a consensus that financial stability must form part of overall economic policy, it is less clear to what extent central banks and monetary policy should deal with it.
“Would you put two million people out of work because banks are too leveraged or house prices are rising too fast? Instead, the first line of defence should be instruments that can target financial stability more directly and efficiently, including macroprudential tools, such as loan-to-value and debt-to-income limits, and capital flow management measures.
"Yet , when these tools prove insufficient, we may have to accept a new trade-off for monetary policy, and the interest rate may have to lend a hand to maintain financial stability.”
And, after a theoretical section about whether stabilising inflation may produce greater instability of output - a proposition that Henry doubts - the narrative continues with a stunning admission for Australia's free floaters at the RBA - the 'whatever don't kill you makes you stronger' boys.
'The IMF says that the success of the Swiss central bank in putting a cap on the value of the Swiss franc raises the issue of whether central banks should also target external stability'.
Gor blimey, Comrades, what are they smoking in Washington?
Mr Uren's commentary may be accessed here. Henry presumes that confidential staff papers are only available to friends of the leaky staffer, and if anyone has such a friend Henry would appreciate a copy of the paper.
To quote just a few of the relevant sentances. The issues [in this submission] concern better management of monetary policy, which requires additional ways to manage Australia's currency and credit growth - in short, effective 'macroprudential' policy.
Monetary policy – defined in the usual way by manipulation of cash rates of interest - cannot by itself adequately control the financial system. ... another policy instrument is needed to modify the effects of a currency value too high to allow the country to have a balanced set of industries.
Other forms of macroprudential policy are needed to modify other asset prices. ... I recommend variable prudential ratios, ratios that rise as asset prices rise and therefore provide some resistance to the development of asset inflation.
I recently presented on 'Asset inflation and monetary policy' at one of Melbourne's distinguished universities. One of the issues our team is grappling with is how to define 'monetary policy'. Is it growth of money supply (Friedman); cash interest rates (Historic gold standard,Taylor, modern central banks); 'Chairman's discretion (Zero cash rates plus 'innovation', eg QE); or some complicated mix of all those things plus 'state of the economy'.
A young professor who had spent significent time at one of the American Federal Reserve banks said something like: 'The Fed makes a judgment on all the available evidence', which reminded Henry of Australia's long-ago dismissed 'check list'. This is what I now call 'the narrative'. A central bank should relate its decisions about monetary policy to the entire set of economic indicators, and explain itself in those terms. The question for outsiders is, or should be: 'Does the narrative make sense'.
There is nothing truly original under the sun, Comrades, but it is good to see the IMF is also stumbling slowly to a better approach. Like generals fighting an old war, however, Australia's financial system regulators are reportedly satisfied that all is well here, due to their brilliance.
Saturday Sanity Break, 5 April 2014
Date: Saturday, April 05, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
Gor blimey, comrades. That Martin Parkinson has got a bit of gorm, discovered his mojo, telling the nation that we have a choice: a steadily increasing avaerage rate of income tax or a widening and broadening of the GST. What a pity he didn't say all this when Australia's least competent Treasurer, Wayne Swan, was busy creating the complete disaster that is Australia's Federal budget. Would have been a career limiting move way back then, of course, but them's the breaks if you are fair dinkum, Parko, old mate.
We haven't seen the report of the Audit Committee yet, but it presumably contains even more ungilded views, justifying the government's latest descriptions, collected here by the AFR's Phillip Coorey.
“Terrible”, “awful” and “horrific” Treasurer Joe Hockey told Alan Jones on Monday this week as he spoke of the legacy inherited from Labor, including a “tsunami” of spending.
An “absolute cataclysmic mess”, was how Prime Minister Tony Abbott described it to Coalition MPs and senators the week before, urging them to spend the six-week autumn parliamentary break in their electorates “reminding people of the challenge we face”.
Fixing the budget is indeed a great challenge. Australia's greater economic challenge is the overall cost level, which Henry has been saying is of the order of 30 to 40 % higher compared to that of competitors and customers.
No newspaper has seen fit to repeat this suggestion, though every week there is fresh evidence.
* In the week just past, BHP let it be known that it costs 50 % more to dig up coal in Australia than in the USA, and several more companies announced their closure here. * Qantas is doomed as an international carrier, because Aussies will not pay the extra 30 % for the priviledge of international travel on the big bird with the flying kangaroo. * Evey week we hear of another bunch of businesses closing down, Toyota, Holden, Forge, the list goes on.
Confirmatory indirect evidence is the detioration in the labor market. Officials and econocrats stick doggedly to the official (ABS) unemployment, which says the rate of unemployment is 'only' 6%, albeit rising slowly.
Those who ask more focussed questions, like Roy Morgan Research, or provide better research, like former Labor pollie, John Black, find a far gloomier situation.
Mr Black's expose is in two big stories in the Weekend Oz; linked here and here.
'The Rudd government inherited a labour market from John Howard and Peter Costello at the end of 2007 that was generating year-on-year almost as many jobs as could be provided annually by growth in members of the population aged 15 or older.
'In September last year, the Abbott government inherited a labour market from Kevin Rudd and Wayne Swan that was generating jobs for only 28 per cent of potential new entrants to the workforce — 94,300 jobs for 334,700 potential new workers.
'In December, this figure dropped to 52,400, or 15 per cent of potential new workers, before climbing slowly back to 68,700 jobs in February. This means the government was then generating enough demand for the market to find places for only one in five potential new workers'.
The fallout is worst for young people, graduating at far too fast a pace for more than a few to find jobs, as discussed here earlier this week with input from Professor Jeff Boreland of Melboure University.
Last night the Hawks smashed Freo, who had started well this season after giving Hawthorn a good fight in last year's Grand final. Collingwood belted the hapless Swans last week, and meet the Catters at the 'G' today. Caaaarlton! meets Essendon on Sunday evening, a really bad time for those of us with jobs to attend, or even to watch on TV, and likely to be a really bad time for the Blues if their inconsistent form in two losses so far this season is any guide. I suppose there is just a chance they put together four scintillating quarters to beat Essendon by a point or two, but I'd rather save that result for the 2021 grand final.
The Aussie shielas' cricket team is into the T20 final and have a fair chance of winning, though I cannot for the life of me think who they are playing. The blokes salvaged a sliver of pride to finish one-three (three losses) by beating Bangladesh.
Otherwise it is the dry season for sport, though we did notice that a famous Aussie swimming family roared into Commonwealth Games contention this week. No doubt there are Aussies doing well in darts or two-up contests or boomeranging throwing in foreign climes, proving yet again that 'Global sport' ranks as highly as mining, agriculture and health services in the list of things we do well enough to make a national objective.
With Mrs Thornton, Henry plans to visit the Bendigo Art Gallery for its acclaimed show, then our next kultural highlight will be a visit to St Petersburgh. (Check out the image of the week for the image of the real Henry Thornton, with Wilberforce a great anti-slavery crusader.)
Image of the week
Those who do not understand history ...
Date: Thursday, April 03, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
'The Reserve Bank of Australia has dumped its overt strategy of talking down the dollar and has ramped up warnings about steep rises in property prices.
'As the central bank’s board left the cash rate at a record-low 2.5 per cent for an eighth straight month, governor Glenn Stevens pointedly declined to describe the currency as “uncomfortably” high – a term he used in December when the dollar was several cents lower than US93¢, which it hit on Tuesday.
'Mr Stevens said the currency’s recent gains reduced the benefit to the economy. At the same time, low rates are expected to boost economic growth, helped by a surge in new home construction.
The shift in tone is a significant acknowledgement recent attempts to “jawbone” the dollar lower have floundered and threaten to undermine the bank’s credibility'.
Curiously, Jacob Greber, AFR's 'Economics correspondent', whose full story is available here, (including a nice video comment), fails to note Henry's clearly articulated explanation of the inconsistency in the RBA's views, posted Monday and available here.
Henry's view is based on the fact that 'monetary policy cannot serve two, [or even three], masters'.
That is, moving cash rates might have a reasonable effect on the economy, and should if managed appropriately, keep goods and services inflation controlled, as in the RBA's agreement with the government.
But moving cash rates cannot, except by chance at particular times in the economic 'cycle', also control the exchange rate or house prices.
Henry's editor's submission to the Murray Enquiry spells this point out as clearly as Henry is capable of doing, and is linked here.
Sadly, those who do not understand history are condemned to repeat it.
Memo Jacob Greber: Henry may be contacted here if you feel a tutorial may be useful.
Youth unemployment - a baffling jigsaw
Date: Wednesday, April 02, 2014
Author: Henry Thornton
No decent person can fail to be moved by the plight of contientious youngsters, with excellent qualifications and aptitude, who cannot get a decent job. The Global Financial Crisis must take a lot of the blame, since 'flight to quality' includes hiring processes. But in Australia's case I also blame the policy of letting 'higher ed' rip, encouraging far to many people to go to universities while downplaying the virtues of good technical training for people who are unsuited to Eng Lit, Maths or Physics or who find Economics boring.
Today's announcenment that the Victorian opposition will rescue a redundant Swinburne Campus from developers and turn it back into a good old-fashioned TAFE is likely to be a small step back to reality with the mix of types of education to match demand in Australia. I predict it will be very popular with voters.
One of Australia's finest economists - of the non-boring variety - is Jeff Boreland of Melbourne University. Jeff is on a one-man crusade to explain the facts of Australia's labor market, and today I present his summary of the youth unemployment, with a link to all articles in his series so far.
• A substantial decline in the employment/population rates of the younger Australian population (aged 15- 19 and 20-24 years) has occurred since 2008. • The decline has been concentrated amongst those not in full-time education who are working full-time and those in full-time education who are working parttime. • The main explanation for the decline has been a slow-down in hiring during the current downturn, which has disproportionately affected young workers. • Employment growth for the younger worforce has been much lower than for the aggregate workforce in manufacturing, construction, retail trade, accommodation and food services, professional services, and health care and social assistance.
Many years ago, when Henry was a visiting Professor at the University of Rome, we met over dinner a lady professor. She explained that jobs like hers were very hard to get in Italy, and she had to work for seven years without pay to get on the academic ladder, which she then climbed with great success.
In the past two years we have been helping our kids, and some of their friends, to get jobs, with a success rate of 5 out of around 8 so far. It goes without saying that all were highly credentialled, well presented and had been coached by friends and relatives in how to approach the dreaded interview. In three of the five cases, it was it seems the practical experience in a real but unpaid job as an 'intern' that seemed to make a difference.
The Roman lady professor's husband, the man who invited Henry to visit his university, explained that the magnificent apartment we were dining in had not been purchased on two professor's salaries. 'In Rome', he explained, 'you only own a property like this if you inherit it'. Australian house prices are headed up again far too quickly for this homeowner-with-children's comfort. Could we be headed for Italy's real estate problems as well as their labor market constraints and practices?